The designed life of many offshore O&G facilities is reaching its end. Decommissioning these facilities has become a critical task due to unpredictable costs, high operational risks, potential social impacts, and finally, environmental protection issues. Decision-making plays a decisive role in finding a trade-off between the concerns and interests of stakeholders such as O&G companies, government bodies, environmental protection organizations, sea and coastal environment users, and local communities. The decision problem is often complex as it usually involves several criteria. Most of the time, there is no one perfect option available to suit all the criteria: an ‘ideal’ option does not usually exist. Therefore, a compromise must be found. To address this problem, the decision-maker may use advanced approaches such as Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). These models have recently attracted the attention of the industry. Here, we describe a new tool that improves the decision-making process by ranking the different decommissioning options of O&G subsea assets. This model considers 37 attributes gathered into 6 criteria: Safety, Environment, Waste management, Technical, Social, and Economic. Several decommissioning alternatives are compared. The new tool has been tested on the Brazilian decommissioning of Espadarte Field, showing remarkable performance in aiding the decision-making process.
Autores:
- Jean-David Caprace1
- Marcelo Igor Lourenço de Souza
- Claudio Violante Ferreira
- Eduardo Ribeiro Nicolosi
Leia o conteúdo na íntegra: